The phrase “Indian giver” might sound innocuous to some, but its history and impact are far from harmless. This colloquialism, often used to describe someone who takes back a gift after giving it, carries a deeply offensive and inaccurate portrayal of Indigenous peoples. Its continued use, even unknowingly, perpetuates harmful stereotypes and erases the complex history of cultural misunderstanding. Understanding the origins and implications of “Indian Gift Giver” is crucial for fostering respectful communication and cultural sensitivity.
The prevalence of this phrase is evident in its appearance across various aspects of popular culture and media. From a 1969 hit song by the 1910 Fruitgum Company titled “Indian Giver” to a 1993 episode of the popular sitcom Seinfeld centered around its offensiveness, the term has been embedded in the North American vernacular for decades. Even prominent figures have been called out for using this derogatory phrase. In 2011, a celebrity family member used it on national television, and a well-known media personality employed it during a televised debate that same year. More recently, in 2012, another media figure used the phrase while covering a major international event. These instances highlight how deeply ingrained and yet how problematic the term “indian gift giver” remains.
To truly grasp the offensiveness of “indian gift giver”, we need to delve into its historical roots. The phrase first appeared in print in 1765. Thomas Hutchinson, in The History of the Province of Massachusetts Bay, defined “an Indian gift” as “a proverbial expression signifying a present for which an equivalent return is expected.” Decades later, in 1860, John Russell Bartlett’s Dictionary of Americanisms further solidified this definition, describing an “Indian giver” as “one who gives a present and then takes it back.” Modern dictionaries, such as Merriam-Webster, still include the term, often with a crucial qualifier: “sometimes offensive,” defining it as “a person who gives something to another and then takes it back or expects an equivalent in return.” While some dictionaries have begun to omit the phrase, its historical presence and lingering usage demand examination of its origins.
Diverse group of people representing different cultures, symbolizing cultural sensitivity and understanding.
The origin of the phrase “indian gift giver” is often debated, with two main theories emerging. One theory suggests the term arose from the U.S. government’s history of treaty violations with Indigenous peoples. This perspective posits that the phrase is a cynical commentary on the government’s practice of making treaties with Native American tribes, granting them land, and then subsequently breaking those treaties and reclaiming the land. In this interpretation, the “Indian giver” is not the Indigenous person but rather the U.S. government, which gave land only to take it back.
However, the more widely accepted and historically grounded theory points to cultural misunderstandings between early European settlers and Indigenous peoples. European settlers, coming from a culture deeply rooted in a monetary economy, struggled to comprehend the Indigenous practice of bartering and gift-giving. When Indigenous peoples presented a gift, they often expected reciprocal exchange, not necessarily of equal monetary value, but something in return to acknowledge the relationship and honor the act of giving. Settlers, unfamiliar with this custom, often misinterpreted these exchanges as simple gift-giving with no expectation of reciprocation.
Furthermore, gift-giving held a central and deeply significant role in many Native American cultures. Gifts were presented with honor and the understanding that the recipient would use and value the item. If a gift was not used or appeared to be unappreciated, it could be taken back and given to someone who would value it. This was not seen as retracting a gift but as ensuring the gift found a worthy recipient. Settlers, failing to understand these cultural nuances of reciprocity and the significance of gift-giving in Indigenous cultures, felt offended when an item was requested back, leading to the inaccurate and derogatory label of “indian gift giver.”
The term “indian gift giver” is therefore not just an outdated expression; it is a phrase born from cultural ignorance and misunderstanding that perpetuates harmful stereotypes. It reduces complex cultural practices to a simplistic and negative caricature, misrepresenting Indigenous traditions and experiences. Using this phrase today, regardless of intent, demonstrates a lack of cultural sensitivity and reinforces a history of disrespect and misrepresentation. Choosing to avoid this phrase is a crucial step in promoting respectful communication and acknowledging the historical and ongoing impact of derogatory language on Indigenous communities.
Instead of using offensive colloquialisms like “indian gift giver”, consider expanding your understanding of cultural communication and awareness. Learning about the nuances of different cultures and the impact of language is essential in today’s interconnected world.
[
